<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Google good for us?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adamsmith.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/1063/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adamsmith.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/1063/</link>
	<description>Commentary on what interests me, reflecting my personal take on the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 03:44:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: What the roofer thinks &#171; The Inquiring Mind</title>
		<link>http://adamsmith.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/1063/#comment-21104</link>
		<dc:creator>What the roofer thinks &#171; The Inquiring Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 04:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamsmith.wordpress.com/?p=1063#comment-21104</guid>
		<description>[...] The experience is of a piece with this much earlier post by Adam on an article by Nicholas Carr in The Atlantic on whether Google.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The experience is of a piece with this much earlier post by Adam on an article by Nicholas Carr in The Atlantic on whether Google&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Carr:Who killed the blogosphere &#171; The Inquiring Mind</title>
		<link>http://adamsmith.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/1063/#comment-7862</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Carr:Who killed the blogosphere &#171; The Inquiring Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamsmith.wordpress.com/?p=1063#comment-7862</guid>
		<description>[...] Carr is a writer who Adam much admires. A while ago Adam posted on Nicholas Carr&#8217;s article in The Atlantic on whether Google was adversely affecting the way we read and think. Mr Carr has a very interesting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Carr is a writer who Adam much admires. A while ago Adam posted on Nicholas Carr&#8217;s article in The Atlantic on whether Google was adversely affecting the way we read and think. Mr Carr has a very interesting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew W</title>
		<link>http://adamsmith.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/1063/#comment-2242</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamsmith.wordpress.com/?p=1063#comment-2242</guid>
		<description>Four pages of it?!

I don&#039;t think I can manage that much anymore, perhaps later, if I find time...

The way we think has changed over time, exposure to the written word, TV, computer games, all alter how we handle information in that our brains adapt to maximise our efficiency in processing our primary sources of information whatever thier nature. The internet has made us less patient with the book which tends to use more literary style which dilutes the actual information.

Similarly, have you noticed how older books, and older movies are slow? How do you think people raised in the modern world would handle the pace of life in a primitive village?

This process of increasing the information density of the environment is (I believe) the principle cause of an interesting phenomenon known as the Flynn Effect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four pages of it?!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I can manage that much anymore, perhaps later, if I find time&#8230;</p>
<p>The way we think has changed over time, exposure to the written word, TV, computer games, all alter how we handle information in that our brains adapt to maximise our efficiency in processing our primary sources of information whatever thier nature. The internet has made us less patient with the book which tends to use more literary style which dilutes the actual information.</p>
<p>Similarly, have you noticed how older books, and older movies are slow? How do you think people raised in the modern world would handle the pace of life in a primitive village?</p>
<p>This process of increasing the information density of the environment is (I believe) the principle cause of an interesting phenomenon known as the Flynn Effect.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
