Adam forecast that the local defeat of Section 92A was but one battle in a long campaign.
This article from The Economist would seem to support his thesis, as what looks like a French variant of S92A is before the French legislature.
 | pdm on More prejudice re the Chi… |
 | adamsmith1922 on More prejudice re the Chi… |
 | robertguyton on More prejudice re the Chi… |
 | Quintin Hogg on A comment on the Crafar d… |
| adamsmith1922 on A comment on the Crafar d… |
| robertguyton on A comment on the Crafar d… |
| pdm on On Mallard’s hypocr… |
| adamsmith1922 on On Mallard’s hypocr… |
| adamsmith1922 on ACT opts for oblivion |
| adamsmith1922 on Has National lost the plo… |
 | smttc on Has National lost the plo… |
| robertguyton on Has National lost the plo… |
| adamsmith1922 on Has National lost the plo… |
| robertguyton on ACT opts for oblivion |
| robertguyton on On Mallard’s hypocr… |
Frog Blog Homepaddock Keeping Stock Kiwiblog No Minister The Standard The Visible Hand in Economics BBC News | News Front Page | World Edition CNN Top Stories New York Times Salon.com – Original, independent news coverage and investigative reporting, and insightful commentary on politics and culture Wired News Top Stories
Trackbacks
Comments are closed.