Perceptions
2009 July 9
Comments are closed for this entry.
| Eric Olthwaite on Do you find Kim Hill irri… | |
| showmetaxcut on Do you find Kim Hill irri… | |
| pdm on Adam’s Winner of the… | |
| pdm on Do you find Kim Hill irri… | |
| Inventory2 on Adam’s Winner of the… | |
| Lucy on Adam’s Losers of the… | |
| Sally on Adam’s Winner of the… | |
| adamsmith1922 on Adam’s Hypocrite of the… | |
| homepaddock on Adam’s Hypocrite of the… | |
| JC on Cartoon for Today, Friday Nove… | |
| Andrew W on Cartoon for Today, Thursday 26… | |
| magicfingers4 on Adam’s Wallies of the… | |
| pdm on Which woman is Tracy Watk… | |
| adamsmith1922 on Which woman is Tracy Watk… | |
| dave on Which woman is Tracy Watk… |
Theme: Vigilance by Jestro













I agree. Notwithstanding the fact that Jackson was obviously a very talented dancer and a competent singer, he was most definitely not a musical genius. What we saw was the front person of an effective and extremely good multimedia and marketing organisation, involving a myriad of extremely talented people.
True musical genius can be seen mostly in Mozart, but I would agree with an argument that the others mentioned in the letter above could also qualify.
I may be somewhat biased, however, due to my tastes in music!
I always thought that, as a singer and musician, Michael Jackson was an impressive dancer.