Quotation for Today, Friday August 7
In its haste to preserve the environment the green movement has sidelined human progress. Today, advocating for growth or new developments is seen as a social faux pas. So strong is their anti-human agenda that some environmentalists are opting for voluntary sterilisation to reduce their carbon footprint.
The green way of looking at sustainable development is typical of the affluent world that sees sustainability as being environmentally friendly: recycling, living in eco houses, and driving fuel-efficient cars. But for the poor and disadvantaged, sustainability is about having essential services such as housing, water, sewerage, and transport.
Sara Hudson, a policy analyst with the Indigenous Affairs Research Program at the Centre for Independent Studies, writing in The Australian. The article dealt with ‘greens’ riding roughshod over the interests of indigenous people in Queensland. As Ms Hudson writes Greens tend to be those who can afford to be green and have no real regard for others. Thus the silly and economically appalling 40 by 2020 campaign in NZ, fronted by impressionable ‘celebrities’
Comments are closed.


Looking at the supposedly Sign On iconic “experts”, one can’t help forming the opinion that in their attempt at proselytizing the unbelievers or perhaps mustering support of the believers – for a movement that is currently been plastered all over the NZ TV screens – that as neo-religious zealots they are living life with the perception of anthropogenic global warming under the shadow of a dangling Damoclesian man-made global warming sword and perhaps checking every personal energy move with a carbon footprint calculator. Being a recipe of futility and an indulgence for them of a posturing intelligentsia for whom conscience is a fashion accessory, these disciples appear to be unaware or unwilling to take the time to check the current monitoring by NASA’s orbiting Aqua satellite of average world temperatures changes(http://icecap.us/images/uploads/CRUMSUCO2June.jpg) where they would see that the Global Temperature anomaly is decreasing while the CO2 level rises, the opposite of what they immorally push.