Skip to content

More on IPCC nonsense – inconvenient truths excluded

February 3, 2010

The FT looks at the IPCC’s Himalayan gaffe. An observation in the article which Adam had not previously been aware of was this one, about the IPCC only considering :-

those findings that fall within a certain consensus

Thus IPCC, the so called definitive voice only reports those facts which support the political view of the relatively small group which decides what goes in and what stays out.

So much for settled science and rigour.

Advertisement
2 Comments
  1. February 3, 2010 4:23 pm

    I’ve opined at Keeping Stock today that climate change is indeed man-made – carefully crafted by the wallahs at the IPCC, and the likes of Phil Jones and even Jim Salinger.

    “The Emperor’s not wearing any clothes”!

    • adamsmith1922 permalink*
      February 3, 2010 8:25 pm

      I2
      absolutely

      until we can be sure the IPCC is truly rigourous, why should we believe!

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.