Skip to content

Ship of Fools

June 30, 2014

Listening to Chris Finlayson at the weekend describing the many headed hydra of the left and to Steven Joyce pondering what is the question if the hydra is the answer caused Adam to remember this morning the old allegory of the Ship of Fools. The picture is from the Bosch painting

300px-Jheronimus_Bosch_011

The Ship of Fools is an allegory drawn from Plato

The allegory depicts a vessel populated by human inhabitants who are deranged, frivolous, or oblivious passengers aboard a ship without a pilot, and seemingly ignorant of their own direction. This concept makes up the framework of the 15th century book Ship of Fools (1494) by Sebastian Brant, which served as the inspiration for Bosch’s famous painting, Ship of Fools: a ship—an entire fleet at first—sets off from Basel to the paradise of fools. In literary and artistic compositions of the 15th and 16th centuries, the cultural motif of the ship of fools also served to parody the ‘ark of salvation’ as the Catholic Church was styled.

In our current world we can visualise the hydra as being, with their hangers on, the passengers on the Ship of Fools. The allegory being especially apt in that the ship is pilotless and nobody on boards knows the direction they are moving in. Then of course we can liken the Labour Party to the Catholic Church, which in past times, was parodied as the ark of salvation, whilst tyrannising the populace with the Inquisition and the relentless pursuit of the Cathars, rather like the present Labour Party pursuit of those members who preofess free trade and/or pro business sentiment.

Or perhaps we can think of the Ship of Fools as a modern day version of the concept written about by Foucault and Barchilion, viz:

Michel Foucault, who wrote Madness and Civilization, saw in the ship of fools a symbol of the consciousness of sin and evil alive in the medieval mindset and imaginative landscapes of the Renaissance. Though this critical angle conflates myth, allegory and history, scholars such as Jose Barchilion have found Foucault’s words on the subject very insightful. In his introduction to Madness and Civilization, Barchilon writes of the Ship of Fools as if it were an example of actual societal practice:

“Renaissance men developed a delightful, yet horrible way of dealing with their mad denizens: they were put on a ship and entrusted to mariners because folly, water, and sea, as everyone then ‘knew’, had an affinity for each other. Thus, ‘Ship of Fools’ crisscrossed the sea and canals of Europe with their comic and pathetic cargo of souls. Some of them found pleasure and even a cure in the changing surroundings, in the isolation of being cast off, while others withdrew further, became worse, or died alone and away from their families. The cities and villages which had thus rid themselves of their crazed and crazy, could now take pleasure in watching the exciting sideshow when a ship full of foreign lunatics would dock at their harbors.”

In many ways Barchilion’s imagery is very appealing when you consider the likely passengers on our modern day NZ Ship of Fools.

Advertisements
3 Comments
  1. Yabby permalink
    August 24, 2014 4:07 pm

    It occurs to me Sir that the Nats got the idea for their 2014 campaign ad off these pages

  2. July 1, 2014 11:03 pm

    The Green/Labour Government will not be kind to those who didn’t support it, Adam.
    Keep up your fitness programme and start adding mung beans to your diet.

  3. Angry Tory permalink
    June 30, 2014 7:38 pm

    The most important points to reiterate in all of this are:

    * NZ has absolutely no precedent for the largest party in parliament not forming government. We just don’t. Precedents from Germany or Scandinavia are not binding in NZ – rather there is the historical fact that the largest single party has always lead the government. If anything other than a National-led government emerges from the next “free and fair election” then such a government will be widely seen as illegitimate, especially by the business community, by Auckland, and over all by the few nett taxpayers who pay for everything for everyone else.

    * if NZ was a democracy, if Key had taken Cam’s excellent advice and returned to FPP – National would govern alone, Labour and the rest would’t even be in parliament.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: